After several months without a significant deal, a lithium exploration company and a lithium producer are the latest investment targets, as demand for the white metal crucial for the manufacture of lithium-ion batteries continues to soar.
This is in spite of the fact that China, a major player in the lithium sector, is going toe to toe with the United States in a trade war that, as of June 1, subjects critical metals like lithium and rare earths to Chinese import tariffs.
In this article we take a deep dive into lithium and examine what effects an escalation of the trade war could have on the global lithium market, in particular the United States as it aims to reduce its dependency on foreign lithium suppliers.
Bacanora Minerals deal
On May 20 Bacanora Minerals (LSE AIM:BCM) announced that Ganfeng Lithium, China’s second biggest lithium producer (the largest is Tianqi Lithium), will buy close to one third of the company. According to a press release, Ganfeng will pay GBP14.4 million (US$17.7 million), or 25 pence a share, for a 30% stake in Bacanora, which is developing the Sonora claystone lithium deposit in Mexico.
The cash payment for 56 million BCM shares also gives Ganfeng the option to buy a 22.5% stake in the Sonora project for $9.6 million, nominate a director to sit on Bacanora’s board, and increase the project stake to 50% within six months. In exchange for its investment, Ganfeng will have the right to purchase one half of all lithium produced at Sonora during its first stage of production.
Alliance Mineral Assets deal
Then on Monday, Alliance Mineral Assets, an Australian lithium producer, said it has entered into a memorandum of understanding with Jiangxi Special Electric Motor, a major Chinese EV maker.
According to a press release, the companies plan to form a 50-50 joint venture to produce and sell battery-grade lithium hydroxide within the next six months to a year. The lithium would be sourced from Alliance’s Bald Hill spodumene operation, then shipped to Jiangxe province where the Chinese EV company would convert it to lithium hydroxide, used in EV battery cathodes.
Alliance notes that one of the agreement’s key benefits is it provides Alliance access to a nearly completed lithium hydroxide circuit in China, rather than having to build a new conversion facility from scratch.
Trade war escalates
Of interest to us at Ahead of the Herd, is not only the interest that Chinese companies are taking in lithium projects, but the timing. They are occurring at the same time as China and the US are ratcheting up the rhetoric in the ongoing trade war and putting more on the table by increasing tariffs on each other.
Could it be that China wants to lock up more lithium supply before lithium prices rise? We know that the lithium market in the long term is likely to be in deficit as troubles ramping up production meet a mounting wall of demand. We also know that China produces roughly two-third of the world’s lithium-ion batteries and controls most of its processing facilities. This give China tremendous clout should it decide to deprive the United States of lithium batteries or raw materials, just as the US is planning a mine-to-EV battery supply chain.
After several weeks of trade negotiations in Washington failed, the US decided to walk away and raise duties on $200 billion in Chinese products to 25% from 10%. In retaliation, Beijing hit $60 billion worth of US exports to China – raising import tariffs to between 10% and 25% on an extensive list of over 5,000 US products. About half are being tariffed at 25%. Among the mineral and chemical products about to be punished on June 1, are sulfur, graphite, asbestos, borate, feldspar, rare earth metal ore, titanium oxide, lithium carbonate, and metal concentrates including iron ore, manganese, copper, nickel, zinc, titanium, zirconium, vanadium, precious metals and mineral sands.
It’s also been reported that the US started a formal process Monday to slap tariffs on China’s remaining exports to the United States – likely leading to higher prices for iPhones, toys and sneakers, among the goods affected.
So far the United States has refrained from ensnaring critical minerals in its net of Chinese goods subject to tariffs, and for good reason; many US companies (and the military) rely on imports of rare earth oxides to make high-tech materials such as electric motors used in EVs, wind turbines and a myriad of defense applications. Disrupting their supply chains would inflict serious harm on them. Same with manganese, necessary for smelting iron ore into steel, and various lithium products plus graphite needed for lithium-ion batteries; for the latter, China is by far the largest producer.
China feels no such need to hold back on critical metals tariffs. But this trade really only goes one way. Very small volumes of minerals and chemicals on the above list are exported from the United States to China. It’s China that holds the power to disrupt these markets, which in several cases is a major producer.
In Trade war will hasten bull market for rare earths, we argued that hitting American rare earth metal exports with tariffs is a red herring, in terms of what drives the rare earth market. But the imposition of export restrictions, perhaps aimed directly at the US, would almost certainly, by exponentially higher prices, pump more steam into a rare earth bull market.
It’s the same thing with lithium; tariffs on US lithium exports are inconsequential. Currently the only US lithium producer is chemicals giant Albemarle. Lithium products from Albemarle’s Silver Peak lithium brine operation in Nevada are sent to its processing plant in North Carolina. This material is then loaded on ships and sent to Asian battery manufacturers, which sell the batteries to automakers.
We don’t know how much lithium hydroxide Albemarle exports to China from Kings Mountain (the company does not disclose the amount to the USGS in tabulating global production statistics), but we do not think it is significant in global terms. According to Visual Capitalist, Silver Peak only produces 1,000 tonnes per year of lithium hydroxide, within a current lithium market of roughly 280,000 tonnes per annum of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), a term that encompasses both lithium hydroxide and carbonate used in EV batteries.
Rather, the larger weapon in China’s arsenal is the ability to use its size in the EV batteries market to bully US lithium consumers. Remember China produces two-thirds of the world’s lithium-ion batteries and has a lock on most lithium-ion processing facilities.
Chinese lithium suppliers and battery makers could restrict lithium sales or stop supplying batteries to US companies, or companies that are planning on manufacturing Evs in the US. Other automakers are planning on building EV and EV battery plants in the United States, but with the threat of their battery supplies being cut off, these new factories are also unlikely to proceed.
Think the China-US trade spat could blow over? It doesn’t look like it. A recent news headline has Chinese President Xi Jinping evoking the iconic Chairman Mao in his quest for world domination.
“We are here at the starting point of the Long March to remember the time when the Red Army began its journey,” Xi said at a rally in Jiangxi province. “We are now embarking on a new Long March, and we must start all over again!” according to a report from the South China Morning Post.
While the trade war wasn’t mentioned, the implication was clear – China is not planning to cave in any time soon, noted CNBC.
China’s lithium domination
A Tesla executive said recently the company is worried about a shortage of lithium. And while the number of EVs on the roads are expected to multiply in coming years, they can only progress as fast as the lithium-ion batteries that go in them.
The pendulum is clearly China. Consider that in 2017, China sold 750,000 electric cars, 50% more than in 2016. And that was only 3% of the Chinese vehicle market. By 2025, the Chinese government wants EVs to represent 20% of all cars sold.
As Quartz notes, in order to maintain its dominance in the lithium market, Chinese manufacturers need a lot of cheap lithium. That explains why its largest lithium miner, Tianqi Lithium, owns 51% of Australia’s Greenbushes spodumene mine – the world’s dominant hard-rock lithium mine. And why China bid for, and got, a 23.7% stake in Chilean state lithium miner SQM, the second largest in the world, for $4.1 billion.
EV growth continues
As noted at the top, two Chinese companies this week inked deals to obtain more lithium, thereby further solidifying China’s position at the top of the lithium heap.
As China’s mark on the lithium market becomes more pronounced, growth in electric vehicles is taking off.
According to Adamas Intelligence, this past February 75% more lithium carbonate was deployed for batteries in electric and hybrid passenger vehicles compared to February, 2018.
Europe in particular is becoming more important, due largely to renewable energy initiatives and buyer incentives.
According to an article in Seeking Alpha, stringent CO2 emissions starting in 2020 “are paving the way for the meteoric rise of electric vehicles.” Germany is looking at doubling subsidies for EVs costing under 30,000 euros and raising subsidies for more expensive electrics. Mercedes Benz wants to make its entire fleet of vehicles carbon neutral by 2039.
GM has just come out with new “electronic architecture” for the interiors of its EVs and self-driving cars. The new systems are capable of carrying 4.5 terabytes of processing power per hour, five times that of current electronics. The new architecture will be deployed in GM’s first EV, the 2020 Cadillac CT5 sedan.
According to Bloomberg, EV sales are expected to increase from 1.1% of the total auto market in 2017, by a factor of 10 by 2025, 27X by 2030 and 50X by 2040. JP Morgan meanwhile is forecasting electric cars to be 35% of the global market by 2025 and 48% by 2030.
A recent article in MINING.com has the world’s largest mining company, BHP, saying that it has raised its forecasts for global adoption and sales of EVs. The diversified miner estimates in 2035 there will be at least 132 million EVs on the road – comprising 7% of the world’s vehicle fleet versus its earlier 5% estimation.
According to Benchmark Intelligence, the growth of lithium-ion gigafactories to supply batteries to all of those EVs, is expected to blossom from 45 in production currently, to 76 by 2028.
Need to develop North American lithium supply
In 2008 the National Research Council saw lithium as potentially becoming a critical mineral due to the expected growth of hybrid vehicle batteries. Two years later the US Department of Energy’s Critical Materials Strategy included lithium as one of 16 key elements.
Lithium is also among 23 critical metals President Trump has deemed critical to national security; in 2017 Trump signed a bill that would encourage the exploration and development of new US sources of these metals.
MINING.com noted that according to the USGS, the United States last year imported around half of 48 minerals last year and 100% of 18 minerals – including 100% of rare earths, graphite and indium.
The publication also quotes Simon Moores, managing director of Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, stating that the US only produces 1% of global lithium supply and 7% of refined lithium chemicals, versus China’s 51%.
The US government recently introduced bipartisan legislation, led by Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, to secure local mineral resources including battery metals lithium, graphite, cobalt and nickel.
The Newswheel reported that the pending bill, called the American Mineral Security Act, “would help boost domestic production of minerals used in making EV batteries” such as GM’s objective of “expanding its battery-production facilities so it can introduce 20 new EV models by 2023.”
Significantly for the current trade war, the legislation would also exempt automakers from paying tariffs for shipping extracted minerals like lithium carbonate and hydroxide overseas for processing, The Newswheel adds.
Junior financing breakdown
The problem is, in order to kickstart exploration for critical minerals, the industry needs more than government support; it requires money.
Raising cash for exploration in the junior resource market right now is difficult, to put it mildly. According to Oreinc, a Vancouver-based research and advisory firm, Canadian-listed mining companies are raising less money and inking fewer deals.
As reported by the Financial Post, Oreinc tracked around 1,400 Canadian mining companies between $100 million and $1.5-billion valuations. It found that in 2018, cannabis companies raised $4 billion versus $217 million by mining companies.
What does this mean for the lithium market? Well, as financings dry up, so does the exploration pipeline. Companies that would normally be out there kicking rocks, sampling, drilling and drumming up shareholders, are in a holding pattern, waiting for the market to come back. In the meantime, the supply of lithium is not growing, especially in North America; shrinking exploration, ergo, flat or depleted supply, plus increasing demand for electrical vehicle batteries, equals higher prices.
One company that is not waiting for the tide to change in the lithium market is Cypress Development Corp. (TSX-V:CYP).
The Vancouver-based company has achieved its objective of confirming that recent metallurgical test results closely match those outlined in a preliminary economic assessment (PEA).
CYP has been testing the metallurgy on its Clayton Valley Lithium Project in Nevada in preparation for a prefeasibility study (PFS) expected to be released soon.
Cypress is sitting on a massive potential lithium mine and the company is smartly taking all the right steps to de-risk it. The impressive resource estimate and PEA, both released last year, should have significantly boosted the stock price. Yet, in our opinion, it is still outrageously undervalued at $0.22 a share.
It also needs to be stressed, Cypress is the only advanced lithium project in North America without a strategic partner or offtake agreement. At AOTH we believe obtaining either following a successful PFS, would be a significant catalyst for a market re-evaluation.
It was noted at the top, Ganfeng’s $17 million investment in Bacanora Minerals and its Sonora claystone lithium project in Mexico. The company makes an interesting comparison to Cypress because CYP’s Clayton Valley Lithium Project would also extract lithium products from lithium-bearing claystones.
The Bacanora deal is valued at 5% of its net present value. If we took that same 5% NPV and applied it to Cypress’ NPV of $1.45 billion, we come up with C$0.81 a share. (CYP currently trades at C$0.22/sh)
Yet in our opinion, CYP has a better deposit than Bacanora’s. CYP’s Clayton Valley Lithium deposit is composed of non-hectorite claystones meaning they require much less processing than Bacanora’s Sonora deposit which contains hectorite.
The amount of sulfuric acid reagent needed is relatively low, and being able to leach the lithium with acid avoids more costly processing associated historically with other claystone deposits, specifically those needing high-temperature roasting.
CYP’s Clayton Valley project also has a very low strip ratio compared to Bacanora’s Sonora.
The company has told me that 15,000 tonnes of material a day can be moved at low cost. This is due in part to the lithium-bearing clay being at surface and having virtually no stripping ratio. At $2 a tonne, the cost of mining the clay is a fraction of the cost of the sulfuric acid needed to process it into lithium carbonate.
Note also that CYP’s project is in Nevada, the most mining-friendly state in the US, in an existing mining district – Clayton Valley – close to population and infrastructure. Versus Baconora which is operating in Mexico.
Junior resource analyst Peter Epstein concurs that Cypress is grossly undervalued when the size of its resource is compared to its enterprise value (EV). Epstein writes:
Cypress has a world-class sized Indicated + Inferred resource of nearly 9 Million “Metric tonnes” (“Mt“) LCE. The Company is trading at an EV/Mt of just C$1.8. That means each Mt of LCE in-situ, (in the ground), is valued at C$1.8, while a Mt of Lithium Carbonate sells for about US$10,000 = ~C$13,400/Mt. Clearly, not all Mt will be mined, and there’s a lot of costs associated with mining, extracting the lithium, disposing of the waste & refining it into salable form. But, comparing the C$1.8/Mt ratio to the peers trading at C$9-C$39/Mt shows again that Cypress looks to be trading very cheap to peers ahead of the release of a PFS this summer.
The current M&A we are experiencing in the lithium space is interesting for the fact that it’s coming at the same time as the screws are being tightened on both the lithium and rare earths markets – US exports of both are now subjected to Chinese import tariffs.
However the trade war is really just a smoke screen for what’s actually occurring in lithium – a further locking down of lithium supplies by China – with the two latest examples occurring this week – first, an investment by Ganfeng Lithium into Bacanora Minerals, and second, an offtake agreement between Alliance Mineral Assets and a major Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer.
If things get uglier on the trade front, there’s nothing stopping China from slapping an embargo of its processed lithium, or lithium-ion batteries, on US lithium consumers, thereby hurting US companies that rely on these products.
It all points to the need to take steps to end North American dependence on foreign lithium, by exploring for and developing local mines.
I am confident in saying that CYP’s project betters what Bacanora has in the ground, and that a significant stock re-rating should be expected upon release of the PFS.
Cypress Development Corp
TSX-V:CYP Cdn$0.22 May 22st
Shares Outstanding 74.2m
Market cap Cdn$16.3m
Richard (Rick) Mills
Ahead of the Herd Twitter
Ahead of the Herd FaceBook
Legal Notice / Disclaimer
This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. Richard Mills has based this document on information obtained from sources he believes to be reliable but which has not been independently verified. Richard Mills makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as
to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Richard Mills only and are subject to change without notice. Richard Mills assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Furthermore, I, Richard Mills, assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information provided within this Report.
Cypress Development Corp (TSX.V:CYP), is an advertiser on Richard’s site aheadoftheherd.com. Richard owns shares of CYP