Global Warming Chickenlittleism

Richard (Rick) Mills

Ahead of the Herd

Page 3 of 3

 

They are cited worldwide to justify swinging fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable’ energy…

 

 

One of the report’s own authors, Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University’s Climate Research Network, last night said this should be the last IPCC assessment – accusing its cumbersome production process of ‘misrepresenting how science works’.”

 

A key new study in the journal Nature Climate Change revealed that nearly all climate models are dramatically inaccurate. On average, the predictions forecasted two times more global warming than actually occurred.

 

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) has produced a report titled ‘Climate Change Reconsidered II’ by the Heartland Institute, the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, and the Science & Environmental Policy Project.

 

“This work provides the scientific balance that is

missing from the overly alarmist reports of the United

Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

(IPCC), which are highly selective in their review of

climate science and controversial with regard to their

projections of future climate change. Although the

IPCC claims to be unbiased and to have based its

assessment on the best available science, we have

found this to not be the case. In many instances

conclusions have been seriously exaggerated, relevant

facts have been distorted, and key scientific studies

have been ignored…Most notably, its authors

say the IPCC has exaggerated the amount of warming

they predict to occur in response to future increases in

atmospheric CO2. Any warming that may occur is

likely to be modest and cause no net harm to the

global environment or to human well-being.”

 

Also from the Executive Summary:

 

"No close correlation exists between temperature variation over the past 150 years and human related CO2 emissions…

 

Evidence is accruing that changes in Earth’s surface temperature are largely driven by variations in solar activity…

 

The recently quiet Sun and extrapolation of solar cycle patterns into the future suggest a planetary cooling may occur over the next few decades."

I found the following on wattsupwiththat.com. It’s an article by Joseph D’Aleo with 25 key rebuttals to the man-made global warming side of the debate.

 

(1) Warming not ‘global’. It is shown in satellite data to be northern hemisphere only

 

(2) It is now not warming. Warming (global mean and northern hemisphere) stopped in the 1990s

 

(3) Models suggest atmosphere should warm 20% faster than surface but surface warming was 33% faster during the time satellites and surface observations used. This suggests GHG theory wrong, and surface temperature contaminated.

 

(4) Temperatures longer term have been modified to enhance warming trend and minimize cyclical appearance. Station dropout, missing data, change of local siting, urbanization, instrumentation contaminate the record, producing exaggerating warming. The GAO scolded NOAA for poor compliance with siting standards.

 

(5) Those who create the temperature records have been shown in analysis and emails to take steps to eliminate inconvenient temperature trends like the Medieval Warm Period, the 1940s warm blip and cooling since 1998. Steps have included removal of the urban heat island adjustment and as Wigley suggested in a climategate email, introduce 0.15C of artificial cooling of global ocean temperatures near 1940.

 

I gave you the first 5 of 25 rebuttals, follow this link to read the other 20 points.

 

97% Consensus - polls say 97 percent of working climate scientists now see global warming as a serious risk.

 

“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics.” Michael Crichton, 17th January 2003, speaking at the California Institute of Technology

 

Conclusion

 

“I think that the latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence.  They are proclaiming increased confidence in their models as the discrepancies between their models and observations increase.” MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen speaking to Climate Depot

 

I agree with Dr. Lindzen, with so much garbage going into, and considering the non-use of so much key data, one would have to expect nothing but garbage to come out of the IPCC report, after all garbage in =’s garbage out.

 

Remember

 

It’s not gas that initially causes the rise in temperatures, its more, or less sunlight.

+- Sunlight = +- temperature = +- gas

 

What the IPCC is doing is chasing a symptom, you cannot cure, fix or regulate how much sunlight reach’s the earth surface.

 

As far as this skeptic is concerned the IPCC’s ‘scientific’ opinion on climate change is influenced by nothing more than funding and political factors.

 

So what might be their agenda?

 

“the theory of man-caused, catastrophic, global warming is embraced not because of any “science,” (that sham is for the “useful idiots,”), but because it is a justification for a government takeover of the energy industry, with massive increases in regulation, taxes and government spending.  The United Nations loves it because it inspires fantasies of the UN growing up to be a world government, with real government powers of global taxation, spending and regulation, all “to save the planet.”  Scientists who go along with the cause are rewarded not only with praise for their worthy social conscience, but also with altogether billions in hard, cold cash (government and environmental grants), for their cooperation in helping to play the “useful idiots.”  Moreover, many academic scientists are “progressives” themselves, and so favor sharp increases in government spending, taxes and regulation, because they are certain they know how to run your life better than you do.” Peter Ferrara,The Coming Revelation Of The 'Global Warming' Fraud Resembles The Obamacare Lie, Forbes

 

Is the real science of climate change, and the political machinations in regards to the UN and the IPCC’s global warming agenda on your radar screen?

 

If not, they should be.

 

Richard (Rick) Mills

 

Richard lives with his family on a 160 acre ranch in northern British Columbia. He invests in the resource, biotechnology/pharmaceutical sectors and is the owner of Aheadoftheherd.com. His articles have been published on over 400 websites, including:

 

WallStreetJournal, USAToday, NationalPost, Lewrockwell, MontrealGazette, VancouverSun, CBSnews, HuffingtonPost, Beforeitsnews, Londonthenews, Wealthwire, CalgaryHerald, Forbes, Dallasnews, SGTreport, Vantagewire, Indiatimes, Ninemsn, Ibtimes, Businessweek, HongKongHerald, Moneytalks, SeekingAlpha, BusinessInsider, Investing.com and the Association of Mining Analysts.

 

Please visit  www.aheadoftheherd.com

 

If you are interested in advertising on Richard’s site please contact him for more information, rick@aheadoftheherd.com

 

 ***

 

Legal Notice / Disclaimer

 

This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment.

 

Richard Mills has based this document on information obtained from sources he believes to be reliable but which has not been independently verified.

 

Richard Mills makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Richard Mills only and are subject to change without notice. Richard Mills assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission.

 

Furthermore, I, Richard Mills, assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information provided within this Report.



«Prev|

1|

2|

3|

About Ahead of the HerdAbout Us

Aheadoftheherd.com is a community where investors trade ideas on the buying and selling of stocks


Ahead of the HerdSponsors List



Ahead of the HerdOur Location

www.aheadoftheherd.com

Office Hours
5am - 4:30pm, M-F
9am - 12pm Saturday

Closed Sunday

 


To contact us please email rick.mills@aheadoftheherd.com

Ahead of the Herd
www.aheadoftheherd.com